Sociological breakdown in the generational sense. Our current roster is, as far as I can tell, mostly drawn from the cohort of people 50-65 years of age. In 1996, you can backdate our ages to, roughly forty something. But in 1996, everybody on the net was, as it were, a kind of early adapter to the second wave of the internet. The first wave, we understood back then from the reports of Steve, Simon and the Winkler, the land of the BBS.
Running with the year 1996, a 16 year old back then is today 28-29. A 25 year old today, maybe somebody for whom Facebook and Twitter and cell phones and texting is second nature, was, in 1996, in sixth grade.
I’m going to split the difference and pose a third internet generation between the 55 year old and the thirty year old. Such a person is 40-50 years of age today, was 28-38 in 1996.
My rough hypothesis is that the mediating forms for net-oriented behavior show correlations with age groups clumped in some arbitrary (as far as division into ‘generations,’) and also structured way. From this I am going to offer a designation:
The current Netdynam roster is aged to come before both the blogging generation and the texting generation.
email discussion groups = Bob Dylan
blogging = Nirvana
Texting/Twitter = Feist
bonus cut:
Fleet Foxes

The ISP I belonged to was a custom written BBS that started with five lines. The sixth was a high speed USRobotics 9600 on a private line. The pace of change from 1200 baud through 2400 was fairly gradual but the bypass of the single manufacturer USR9600 by the over 100 manufacturers of 14.4K complete with sysop discounts made for a very rapid change – My ISP shot past 100 lines and finished life – a buyout by a large concern – at just over 500 incoming lines.
Dialup became high speed became cable and the acceleration continued. Whole islands of users languished in AOL and other gathering places paying not only for connection but the dubious add on value of that community and its services.
So, perhaps within generational divides the subclasses contain early adopters, focused participants, content creators, hangers on, leeches, dilettantes, dabblers and the herd.
April 8th, 2009
Twitter devotees are grayer than one might expect: The majority of Twitter’s roughly 10 million unique Web site visitors worldwide in February were 35 years old or older, according to comScore.
In the U.S, 10 percent of Twitter users were between 55 and 64, nearly the same amount of users as those between 18 and 24, which accounted for 10.6 percent of the total.
more at Memex Blog
When,albeit briefly held the pot-professional anthro and adult learning semi-portfolio as a staff member for the technical services department at Lakewood Public Library here, the staff was 2/3 twenty-somethings and 1/3 older. That I came to this with computer skills forged over twenty years (1985+) initially surprised my colleagues, yet the digital generational divide was also apparent. It was especially so with respect to the various types of users in the library’s large public computer center.
Meanwhile, I have myself been surprised at how few of my longtime friends are ‘technologically savvy’ and my observations with respect to this group of friends are focused on fifty-something users.
In the end not wanting to disrupt what was a good thing I stopped by less and less.
My final demonstration came when I upgraded my Amiga 3000T to 10M of RAM, 19″
VGA monitor which I brought in on my way home. I gave them a quick demonstration of a computer which multitasked, when it wasn’t known as a necessity, showing them my bbs, paint programs, word processors, desktop publisher, internet newsgroup and mail,
general gewgaws all running at the same time within a mere 10M of RAM.
I could have accelerated them to the fore of the online presence that was starting.
It never happened, another of life’s lessons.
I really have no long term friends – longer than say two decades – who are not computer savvy either at a level commensurate or well past my abilities and almost all are younger than I.
I think people tend to be attracted to the music they listened to as they emerged from adolescence. Now the list members were way past adolescence when they discovered the internet, but for younger people maybe the form of communication popular when they were first given freedom to roam — post adolescence — will be the one they continue to like the best.