<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virtual Teams article</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.netdynam.org/2009/05/18/virtual-teams/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.netdynam.org/2009/05/18/virtual-teams/</link>
	<description>A Web 2.0 outgrowth of our study of group dynamics on the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 12:27:13 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.netdynam.org/2009/05/18/virtual-teams/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 10:44:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netdynam.org/?p=903#comment-347</guid>
		<description>yeah, the competencies smack of boilerplate, all right.  good ol&#039; boilerplate.  the stuff that keeps ships afloat.  the stuff we use over and over again because it works.

kinda reminds me of &#039;Numa Numa en Pointe&#039;.  Rules are broken best by those as know how to keep &#039;em.  Ever see a Navy destroyer with a rooster-tail wake?  It&#039;s a sight, I&#039;ll tell ya.

one thing I noticed was that she does not post her her academic publications, which seems a shame.  not on the open academic bandwagon, and obviously on tour for her book.  forgivable, if not desirable.  Have to agree with you that she tripped all over the &#039;much more important&#039; statement.

however, it was the previous paragraph that led me to post this.  reading it reminded me that even when we butt heads we&#039;ve still got each others back... 

oh, and I liked the opener about flexibility in swapping hats.  I&#039;ll be paging through the book myself... let me know if you strike on anything useful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[yeah, the competencies smack of boilerplate, all right.  good ol&#8217; boilerplate.  the stuff that keeps ships afloat.  the stuff we use over and over again because it works.<br />
<br />
kinda reminds me of &#8216;Numa Numa en Pointe&#8217;.  Rules are broken best by those as know how to keep &#8216;em.  Ever see a Navy destroyer with a rooster-tail wake?  It&#8217;s a sight, I&#8217;ll tell ya.<br />
<br />
one thing I noticed was that she does not post her her academic publications, which seems a shame.  not on the open academic bandwagon, and obviously on tour for her book.  forgivable, if not desirable.  Have to agree with you that she tripped all over the &#8216;much more important&#8217; statement.<br />
<br />
however, it was the previous paragraph that led me to post this.  reading it reminded me that even when we butt heads we&#8217;ve still got each others back&#8230; <br />
<br />
oh, and I liked the opener about flexibility in swapping hats.  I&#8217;ll be paging through the book myself&#8230; let me know if you strike on anything useful.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hoon</title>
		<link>http://www.netdynam.org/2009/05/18/virtual-teams/#comment-340</link>
		<dc:creator>hoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 22:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.netdynam.org/?p=903#comment-340</guid>
		<description>The competencies are boilerplate.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Beyond that, I’d say that the development of the eleven skills I mentioned earlier are much more important than any other personality traits for developing a highly creative and effective virtual team.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hey, wait a minute! Nemiro has a PhD. Huh? &quot;I&#039;d say,&quot; lets her off the hook?

What comes first? Her hypothesis is researchable. One can imagine bad combos of brilliant competence and ugly personality, and visa versa in the domain she specified. Obviously, the passenger wants their pilot to be first of all competent.

Jill Nemiro is an academic so she has to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csupomona.edu/~jenemiro/publications.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;publish&lt;/a&gt;.

Being one, I am in sympathy with constructivists. But I&#039;m a little less able to wrap my head around the logical typing implicit in &#039;much more important&#039; in this peculiar juxtaposition of two orders, personality and skill. 

How less practiced are tools for leveraging personality characteristics! 

I&#039;ll have to check her book out and see if it&#039;s sensible. Thanks for the pointer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[The competencies are boilerplate.<br />
<br />
<blockquote>Beyond that, I’d say that the development of the eleven skills I mentioned earlier are much more important than any other personality traits for developing a highly creative and effective virtual team.</blockquote><br />
<br />
Hey, wait a minute! Nemiro has a PhD. Huh? &#8220;I&#8217;d say,&#8221; lets her off the hook?<br />
<br />
What comes first? Her hypothesis is researchable. One can imagine bad combos of brilliant competence and ugly personality, and visa versa in the domain she specified. Obviously, the passenger wants their pilot to be first of all competent.<br />
<br />
Jill Nemiro is an academic so she has to <a href="http://www.csupomona.edu/~jenemiro/publications.htm" rel="nofollow">publish</a>.<br />
<br />
Being one, I am in sympathy with constructivists. But I&#8217;m a little less able to wrap my head around the logical typing implicit in &#8216;much more important&#8217; in this peculiar juxtaposition of two orders, personality and skill. <br />
<br />
How less practiced are tools for leveraging personality characteristics! <br />
<br />
I&#8217;ll have to check her book out and see if it&#8217;s sensible. Thanks for the pointer.]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
